TOMORROW'S LEARNING

 

"School days, school days,

Dear old golden rule days;

Readin’ and writin’ and ‘rithmatic

Taught to the tune of the hickory stick."

Few remember that little ditty.  Only the dinosaurs recall the hickory stick.  And nowadays the ‘readin and ‘writin are called communications skills, and the ‘rithmatic is math.

Things do change in the world of education, but not much and not very quickly.  Students everywhere return to their rows of uncomfortable desks at 8 o’clock, 9 o’clock and through hourly tolling bells.  They listen to their teachers lecture to them so they can fill their notebooks for the end-of-term exams.

Things have changed in the world of education but not much nor very quickly.  Think of it:  not since the invention of the printing press has any of the new media had much affect on education.  Newspapers and magazines were literally ignored except by journalism classes, and those are only recent additions to college programs.

Educators have snubbed radio and television until quite recently when audio-visual aids gained some credence in academia.  Computers have just begun to find their way past computer science departments and a few special purpose laboratories.  A cheerless truth:  educational institutions have been married to book publishers.

Earlier, media outside of books--like newspapers, magazines, radio and television--all carried information, but none of them had either the breadth or depth to hold serious sway over schools or colleges.  But now comes the crunch.  Computers, especially when combined with other media, can and will provide both the breadth and depth needed for incredible educational innovation and reform.

The result: much of what has constituted the inner workings of academic worlds, including lecturers, classrooms and libraries, will soon become obsolete.  It will soon be possible for young learners to get a better education, mostly at home, than they now get in schools and universities.  If that doesn’t happen, we’ll know for certain that parents send their children to school not to be educated but to get rid of them.

Take a close look at the present situation:  students sit for hours on uncomfortable chairs in overcrowded classrooms at set times, and they listen to dull lectures that they forget soon after the class bell rings.  It doesn’t matter whether the learner is wide awake, feeling ill, preoccupied with thoughts related to his or her personal life or simply not in the mood for lectures at the assigned time. Tomorrow’s learning will change that drastically.

Tomorrow, the best lecturers in the world will follow the example of Jacob Bronowsky when he produced “The Ascent of Man” with the BBC.  His thirteen-part series was just the right amount of lecturing for a college course in the History of Science.  

    

I can’t think of a duller topic in the hands of a bad lecturer than the History of Science.  But Bronowski is an exhilarating lecturer.  Combine that with being filmed on location with all of the camera techniques and sound effects to enhance the lectures, and you have a prescription for tomorrow’s great lectures.

A unique bonus comes from filmed lecture series:  they can be viewed at home through a TV or PC monitor at a time that’s convenient for the viewer and not at a set time that’s convenient for classroom occupancy, regardless of the condition or state of mind of the listener. 

Add to that the fact that a filmed lecture series can be replayed in part or in its entirety for what the listener may have missed the first time. It can be replayed as a review for an examination—something that can’t be done with a live but lifeless lecturer on campus.

Another miserable feature of the current situation in education has to do with inadequate libraries.  Since academic institutions put so much stock in books, you’d think that library facilities would be open round the clock and be chock-a-block with books and periodicals.  They’re not, except in the rarest circumstances where learners happen to live within commuting distance of the greatest libraries, like the Harvard University Library, The British Library, The New York Public Library, the Library of Congress or Bibliotheque nationale de France.

Even the largest and best libraries have limited opening hours, which means if you do your best research between Midnight and 3 AM you’re out of luck.  Most libraries, regardless of their opening hours, remain miserably under stocked.  They just haven’t the funds to buy an adequate number of titles to support any serious research.

Now, the Internet holds the promise to someday provide the library of the world.  At present, some huge hurdles remain in the way:  publishers would have to forego a lucrative market of thousands of libraries; and authors would have to sacrifice a modicum of their royalties in favor of service to the public.

In the meantime, when the great libraries begin to realize a sense of responsibility to public literacy, they will undertake projects to digitalize their holdings of publications that no longer have copyright restrictions.  These could then be made available on a well-stocked and catalogued Internet public library.

The much under-funded and under-supported Project Gutenberg has at least made a start that provides the major libraries with a model.

Some potential exists for peer-to-peer sharing of books under copyright.  This whole idea distresses the profiteers in the publishing business.  However, nothing in any copyright law should prevent people from lending or giving their books to others. 

How many people should I be limited to lending to?  As a university professor, I loaned or gave my books to hundreds of students over the years. The fact that we now have a medium that makes sharing with thousands rather than a few or a few hundred should not inhibit the practice of giving. 

Book publishers will simply need to adapt to their own areas of obsolescence.  Typesetters had to find other employment when computers in the printing industry replaced them.  Why should publishers have special privileges in stopping progress, especially when that progress can benefit so many?  No one protected the scribes from becoming obsolete when the printing press got invented.  Yet, somehow, modern-day publishers seem to think that they are a special privileged class of profiteers.

Modern technology has already been adapted to online tutorials.  A number of universities already offer online classes.  The World Lecture Hall at The University of Texas provides a clearinghouse of previously offered university courses on the Internet.  The courses are free, a truly admirable public service.

Some services, particularly in technology areas, have developed quite sophisticated and appealing tutorials.  Though most charge fees, they can be quite reasonable for the content they deliver.  Learn2 provides an excellent example of well-developed online tutorials at practical costs.

One of the most attractive features of tomorrow’s learning resides in the ability to select the time that’s convenient to you.  That means no more rushing to get to an 8 o’clock class when you didn’t get enough sleep the night before.  It means no more sitting at uncomfortable desks through dull lectures when you’re feeling unwell or when you have personal problems distracting you.

It also means that you can learn in the comfort of your home (or wherever else you and your computer can find comfort).  You can stop and take a break when you feel like it, eat when you’re hungry and relieve yourself when necessary.

The Internet’s learning conveniences will ultimately provide everyone with the sheer luxury of becoming self-taught.

HOME        CONTENTS        NEXT

copyright © 2002-2005 Paul J. Balles